Gary North on current economic affairs and investment markets
Home | Contact Me | Tell a Friend | Text Size | Search | Member Area
 Join Us
Gain immediate access to all of our current articles, the question-and-answer forums, "ten best" lists, and article archives. Click here for details on how to join.
 Free Materials
 About This Site
 Academic Gaps
 Academic Re-Entry
 Articles
 Capitalism and the Bible
 Comic Strips--My Big 5
 Dave Barry Re-Runs
 Economic Analysis
 Federal Reserve Charts
 Free Books by Gary North
 Get Published Here!
 Gold Price & My Report
 Price Index (U.S.A.)
 Questions for Jim Wallis
 Reality Check E-Letter
 Social Security/Medicare
 Stock Market Charts
 U.S. Debt Clock
 Yield Curve
 For Members Only
 Gary North's Miscellany
 Advertising
 Autoresponders
 Blogging
 Budgeting for Wealth
 Business Start-Up
 Career Advancement
 College Finances
 Discount Deals
 Federal Reserve Policy
 Goal-Setting for Success
 Inheritance Strategies
 Insurance
 International Investing
 Investment Basics
 Marketing Case Studies
 Peak Oil
 Precious Metals
 Real Estate
 Retirement
 Safe Places
 State of the Economy
 Stocks and Bonds
Join Now
 Special Reports
 Business Tools
 Members' Free Manuals
 Our Products
 Action Steps
 Article Index
 Contact Me
 Help
 Tell a Friend
 Text Size
 Your Account
 Legal Notes
 My 100% Guarantee
 Privacy Policy
 Terms of Use


home | Questions for Jim Wallis | What, Exactly, Is a Moral Federal Bu . . .
 

What, Exactly, Is a Moral Federal Budget?

Printer-Friendly Format

Why don't liberals ever suggest that the government lower taxes after a war is over?

I have watched liberal politicians for 50 years. I have never heard one of them call for tax reductions after a war. Always, they say, "Now let's spend the money that the IRS collected, plus the money we borrowed, on the poor. Don't lower taxes."

With whatever the money the public was willing to pay to fund the war, the Demorats want to spend forever: to seek votes of the poor and votes of guilt-ridden middle class liberals.

This is why you rarely see liberals vote against a war. They love what war does: it expands the level of taxes that voters will accept. Then, when the war goes sour -- and only then -- they call for peace. They don't call very loudly. The only way for Congress to get peace is to cut off the funding. But Democrats refuse to do this because they hate tax cuts more than they hate war.

Jim Wallis is typical. He calls himself a radical Christian. He campaigns as a defender of peace. That is all to the good. But he does not send out letters telling his donors to call on Congress to stop the war's funding immediately. That would alienate his Democrat donors and his contacts on Capitol Hill, who are unwilling to do anything this controversial. Instead, he calls for an end to the war on these terms: the government gets to keep all the money that went for the war, permanently, in order to give to welfare bureaucrats to spend on the poor (after deducting their salaries and overhead).

Liberals have done this ever since 1945. The result? Ever higher Defense Department spending, and not much welfare spending by comparison.

Liberals are incurably naive. They think the U.S. government will quit spending on war-related items just because a war ends. But military spending always goes up. Liberals never do get their hands on the most of the post-war loot. They do not learn from experience.

It was President Eisenhower, a Republican, who warned in his farewell address against the military-industrial complex. His successor, John F. Kennedy, won the election in 1960 because he said there was a missile gap between the USA and the USSR. (There wasn't, and he knew there wasn't during the campaign.)

With this as background, listen to Wallis's March 28, 2007 appeal to his supporters.

Tell Congress to Pass a Moral Budget Congress is deciding on the outlines of this year's federal budget. At stake are billions of dollars for working families and poor children in the United States and around the globe.

For years now, people of faith have been fighting bad budgets that prioritize tax cuts and military spending over social supports for the poorest in our society. This year, Congress has an opportunity to pass a budget that puts people first.

Tell your representative to vote for a moral budget that honors our commitment to "the least of these"!

There is a saying among some fundamentalists, "Once saved, always saved!" Wallis has rewritten it: "Once taxed, always taxed!"




Printer-Friendly Format