Gary North on current economic affairs and investment markets
Home | Contact Me | Tell a Friend | Text Size | Search | Member Area
 Join Us
Gain immediate access to all of our current articles, the question-and-answer forums, dozens of free books, and article archives. Click here for details on how to join.

 Free Materials
About This Site
Academic Gaps
Academic Re-Entry
Articles
Capitalism and the Bible
College Finances
Comic Strips--My Big 5
Dave Barry Re-Runs
Debt Management
Economic Analysis
Federal Reserve Charts
Gary North's Free Books
Get Published Here!
Gold Price & My Report
Keynes Project
Mira Costa 1959
Price Index (U.S.A.)
Questions for Jim Wallis
Reality Check E-Letter
Social Security/Medicare
Stock Market Charts
Study Habits
Sustained Revival
U.S. Debt Clock
Yield Curve
 For Members Only
Gary North's Miscellany
Advertising
Blogging
Budgeting for Wealth
Business Start-Up
Career Advancement
Discount Deals
Federal Reserve Policy
Fireproof Your Job
Goal-Setting for Success
Inheritance Strategies
Insurance
International Investing
Investment Basics
Marketing Case Studies
Obamanomics
Peak Oil
Precious Metals
Real Estate
Remnant Review
Retirement
Safe Places
State of the Economy
Stocks and Bonds
The Doctor Is In!
Video Channel Profits
War With Iran
Join Now
 Special Reports
Business Tools
Members' Free Manuals
Our Products
 Action Steps
Article Index
Contact Me
Help
Tell a Friend
Text Size
Your Account
 Legal Notes
My 100% Guarantee
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use


home | Stock Market Charts | The Old Payola Roll Blues Revisited: . . .
 

The Old Payola Roll Blues Revisited: Covering Up the Losses
Gary North
Printer-Friendly Format

June 4, 2009

Back in 1960, a scandal hit the country. It turned out that record companies had paid big-city disk jockeys money to play the firms' records. Congress was shocked! It passed a law making this illegal. The money was called payola: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola

Stan Freberg, the great comic satirist, produced a record called The Old Payola Roll Blues. It made fun of a company that took a no-talent singer and made him a star. The record became a hit. Disk jockeys played it for free.

Congress has its own variation, called campaign contributions.

The Wall Street Journal posted a creative interactive chart that shows how much money the financial services industry gave to members of the House Financial Services Committee last fall.

The committee authorized legislation that allowed the Financial Services Accounting Board (FASB) to change the rules forced on the FASB by the Securities & Exchange Commission: mark to market, i.e., list the market value of assets, especially securitized mortgage packages. These securities had collapsed in value. Mark to market would have forced the financial services industry to count these capital losses as . . . capital losses! The deadline: April 1, 2009, when the new rules would be applied retroactively to first-quarter reports. The FASB changed its rules on April 3.

The chart is here.

The reality of the capital losses has not changed. The write-downs were not made. The losses remain. The banks are sitting on these losses, just as the Japanese banks have done for 19 years.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation indefinitely postponed a central element of the Obama administration's bank rescue plan on Wednesday, acknowledging that it could not persuade enough banks to sell off their bad assets.

In a move that confirmed the suspicions of many analysts, the agency called off plans to start a $1 billion pilot program this month that was intended to help banks clean up their balance sheets and eventually sell off hundreds of billions of dollars worth of troubled mortgages and other loans.

Many banks have refused to sell their loans, in part because doing so would force them to mark down the value of those loans and book big losses. Even though the government was prepared to prop up prices by offering cheap financing to investors, the prices that banks were demanding have remained far higher than the prices that investors were willing to pay.

This was the basis of Japam's zombie banks. They would not make loans to finance private industry. Economic growth slowed.

Geithner wants to preserve zombie banks.

The change in accounting was the origin of the stock market rally. It is based on jiggered accounting.

The real P/E ratio is much worse (higher) than real earnings would have established. There are fewer earnings.

Investors want to believe that accounting changes change reality. The public does not care. But when losses continue, and when the Treasury's deficit absorbs money that would have gone into stocks, when unemployment hits 11%, reality will make itself felt.

People want to live in fantasy land. This is especially true of Congress. Everyone wants to defer the day of reckoning -- an accounting concept.


Printer-Friendly Format