Gary North on current economic affairs and investment markets
Home | Contact Me | Tell a Friend | Text Size | Search | Member Area
 Join Us
Gain immediate access to all of our current articles, the question-and-answer forums, "ten best" lists, and article archives. Click here for details on how to join.
 Free Materials
 About This Site
 Academic Gaps
 Academic Re-Entry
 Articles
 Capitalism and the Bible
 Comic Strips--My Big 5
 Dave Barry Re-Runs
 Economic Analysis
 Federal Reserve Charts
 Free Books by Gary North
 Get Published Here!
 Gold Price & My Report
 Price Index (U.S.A.)
 Questions for Jim Wallis
 Reality Check E-Letter
 Social Security/Medicare
 Stock Market Charts
 U.S. Debt Clock
 Yield Curve
 For Members Only
 Gary North's Miscellany
 Advertising
 Autoresponders
 Blogging
 Budgeting for Wealth
 Business Start-Up
 Career Advancement
 College Finances
 Discount Deals
 Federal Reserve Policy
 Goal-Setting for Success
 Inheritance Strategies
 Insurance
 International Investing
 Investment Basics
 Marketing Case Studies
 Peak Oil
 Precious Metals
 Real Estate
 Retirement
 Safe Places
 State of the Economy
 Stocks and Bonds
Join Now
 Special Reports
 Business Tools
 Members' Free Manuals
 Our Products
 Action Steps
 Article Index
 Contact Me
 Help
 Tell a Friend
 Text Size
 Your Account
 Legal Notes
 My 100% Guarantee
 Privacy Policy
 Terms of Use


home | Questions for Jim Wallis | If the Bible Doesnt Offer an Economi . . .
 

If the Bible Doesn't Offer an Economic Blueprint, Are You Making This Up As You Go Along?
Gary North
Printer-Friendly Format

The Bible doesn't propose any blueprint for an economic system, but rather insists that all human economic arrangements be subject to the demands of God's justice, that great gaps be avoided or rectified, and the poor are not left behind. -- Jim Wallis, "Seattle: Changing the Rules," Sojourners Magazine (March-April 2000).

I wonder, Mr. Wallis, why you bother to quote the Bible, however selectively, when you are promoting one or another welfare state project. I mean, if the Bible doesn't propose a blueprint for economics, then why not quote the Communist Manifesto? Like you, Marx and Engels promoted the graduated income tax. They did so as one of ten reforms in the establishment of a Communist society. You, of course, don't make that claim. You have a different agenda.

Does your agenda have a blueprint? I have yet to see you spell it out. It appears to be a hidden agenda.

If the Bible does not offer an economic blueprint, then what does it offer? Is it little more than a convenient grab-bag for reformers, radicals, revolutionaries, fundamentalists, reactionaries, and all groups in between to use to promote their own agendas? If it doesn't tell us what is morally and judicially mandatory, then where is its authority in matters economic?

You have said repeatedly that Christians must speak prophetically. Why, even in your anti-blueprint article, you say this.

As I listened to the prophetic scripture being read, I marveled at how it was being used that night -- as a relevant contribution to a public discussion on the rules of global trade!

I have noticed an odd thing in your many calls to be prophetic. In every instance, you do not tell us that the prophets invariably appealed back to the laws of Moses as the basis of their own witness. You never refer back to the detailed structure of economic laws in the Mosaic law. In fact, you deny that such a structure exists.

How can we trust a prophetic witness that denies the very basis of all prophetic witness? You never deal with this crucial issue -- the issue of biblical authority.

In contrast to you, I find that the Bible does provide an economic blueprint. I have written over 8,000 pages of verse-by- verse Bible commentaries on this, plus many thousands of pages of books and newsletters. Yet you say that it offers no blueprint.

There is an old saying: "A universal negative is refuted by a single positive." I have provided a whole lot of positive. But you continue to ignore it.

"Gary North? Who's he?" I wonder how much longer this tactic can go on. It reminds me of Ron Sider's identical tactic. "David Chilton? Who's he?"

By the way, it didn't work for Sider, either.


Printer-Friendly Format