Gary North on current economic affairs and investment marketsGary North -- Specific Answers
HomeContact MeTell a FriendText SizeSearchMember Area
Gain immediate access to all of our current articles, the question-and-answer forums, dozens of free books, and article archives. Click here for details on how to join.

About This Site
Academic Gaps
Capitalism and the Bible
Christian Economics
Clichés of Protectionism
College Finances
Debt Management
Ellen Brown: Critique
Federal Reserve Charts
Gary North's Free Books
Get Published Here!
Gold Price & My Report
Keynes Project
One Lesson
Price Index (U.S.A.)
Questions for Jim Wallis
Remnant Review
Social Security/Medicare
Sustained Revival
Tea Party Economist
U.S. Debt Clock
Yield Curve
Your YouTube Channel
Gary North's Miscellany
Budgeting for Wealth
Business Start-Up
Career Advancement
Digital Tools
Education That Works
Evernote: Free Notes
Federal Reserve Policy
Fireproof Your Job
Goal-Setting for Success
Great Default
Inheritance Strategies
International Investing
Investment Basics
Job and Calling
Keynesian Economics
Marketing Case Studies
Precious Metals
Real Estate
Safe Places
State of the Economy
Stocks and Bonds
Study Habits
Video Channel Profits
Members' Free Manuals
Our Products
Contact Me
Tell a Friend
Text Size
Your Account
My 100% Guarantee
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

This site powered by MemberGate

Historical Response #27: Ellen Brown Denies That Hitler's National Socialism Was Socialistic and Keynesian.

Gary North
Printer-Friendly Format

Ellen Brown praised Hitler's economic policy in Web of Debt. She wants America to adopt his economic policy.

I said in my critique that his centralizing economic policies were implemented only because of his political policy: centralization. I argued along the lines that Hayek did in The Road to Serfdom (1944): Hitler's centralizing economic policies led to his reign of terror.

The Left always has denied Hayek's thesis. We can have centralized economic planning without tyranny, the Left says. So does Ellen Brown. This is one more reason why we should regard her as a leftist. You can read my critique here:

Here, she reasserts her original thesis. She begins by trying to distinguish Hitler's politics (national socialism) from Hitler's politics (Keynesian socialism). Why this fine distinction? Because she wants to get the monster's political and military policies off the playing field to justify her cheerleading. She is trying to convince us that she is a cheerleader only for the first two years of his regime (which included the "night of the long knives"), when he was a good guy, but not for the years when -- lo and behold! -- he somehow turned into a bad guy without warning.

27. Hitler's National Socialism ended the Great Depression in Germany.

"National socialism" was a political party. I was talking about an economic policy. In any case, I don't see that your sources say otherwise than that it worked. They say it was military spending at the end of the 1930s that kept the economy going, but I was writing about the early 1930s, and there are many sources that I cite supporting my point. You write:

Ellen Brown adds this:

While Hitler clearly deserved the opprobrium heaped on him for his later military and racial aggressions, he was enormously popular with the German people, at least for a time. [Web of Debt, p. 235.]

Her message: Hitler was a man of the people! She wants the United States to follow his lead . . . but only in economic policy, of course. Not the concentration camps. Not the war.

She does not draw the obvious conclusion, namely, that the centralized power of the government over money, business, and labor was basic to the power which that government imposed over the Jews and other minorities. It is almost as if his racial tyranny and military aggression were completely divorced from his economic views and the government's economic policies.

I addressed this in my earlier response: tyranny and military aggression are NOT necessary corollaries of governments using their own national credit power to get their economies going again. They did not result in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Guernsey, or the American colonies when that economic policy was pursued.

The Guernsey example is Greenbacker fairy tale, as I have said for 45 years. I choose to ignore it here.

First, she argued in her book that Hitler's Germany escaped the Great Depression because it became a welfare state. I presented evidence from the world's leading expert on Nazi Germany's economy that Hitler was building a military force. The welfare state aspects of his spending program were marginal compared to the military spending. She chose to ignore this argument in her response.

Second, she argued that this deliverance was accomplished with the equivalent of fiat money -- Greenbacks. It was not. She now says she was talking about 1933-35. But the recovery took longer, until 1938. In Götz Aly's book, Hitler's Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Welfare State (2005), the author writes:

Upon taking power in 1933, Hitler promised, above all, to put German's 6 million unemployed back to work. He was able to achieve this goal within five years (p. 27).

So, it took five years, 1933-38, to accomplish this. How did Hitler do this?

When Hitler assumed the daily business of running the government in 1933, the Depression had already bottomed out. It was the perfect moment for his financial experts to promote the incipient economic recovery (p. 38).

Did he use fiat money to fund the state's projects? No; the government used bank-provided debt. The Nazi economy was Keynesian, as I said in my original critique.

Yet with additional expenditures exceeding additional revenues by almost 300 percent, public debt increased in the first two years of the Nazi regime by 10.3 billion reichsmarks (p. 38).

She tries in her response to say that she was talking only about 1933-35. But this expansion of debt took place in 1933-35. Thus, her arguments for Hitler's success, 1933-35, collapse like the proverbial house of cards. Hitler's regime offers no evidence for her case for Greenback economic salvation.

In short, once again, her book and her attempted response reveal that she does not know what she is talking about.

She is left as a cheerleader for Hitler, when he in fact was a Keynesian. She thinks she can shrug off the centralizing power of the Nazi state by saying, "But I was talking only about 1933-35." But the peacetime economic recovery held through 1939, when the war began. That was the era of the Great Depression, worldwide. It was also the era of the Germany's laws against the Jews. She wants us to accept the success of the "good Nazi era," 1933-35, and thereby escape responsibility for being a cheerleader for a monster.

It doesn't wash. If she thinks it does, she is naive.

Second, she presented not a shred of evidence that the following nations escaped the Great Depression prior to World War II's mass inflation, price controls, conscription, and rationing: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

Third, she remains oblivious to the hyperinflation and devastation that the fiat money of the American Revolution produced. She simply chooses to ignore the evidence that I presented.

Fourth, compared to the economic liberty that existed before the Great Depression, today's high-tax welfare states are far less free than they were. She cannot see this, because she is a leftist who wants less freedom and more welfare state spending. This is what I have said repeatedly in my criticisms of her.

Ellen Brown is the incarnation of the crest in the stained glass window that Britain's socialist Fabian Society adopted: a wolf in sheep's clothing. You can see the window here. You can read about it here. Here is an artist's drawing of the Fabian shield/crest, based on the image in the window.

Leonard E. Read, the founder of the Foundation for Economic Education, used to say that today's voters are so ignorant of the principles of liberty that they cannot tell the difference between liberty and coercion. He said that 40 years ago. This comment surely applies to Ellen Brown.

Hayek was widely dismissed or ignored by the intelligentsia until he won the Nobel Prize in 1974. The Road to Serfdom was still not taken seriously by most of academia until after the official suicide of the Soviet Union on the last day of 1991, a few months before Hayek died. Ellen Brown is still unpersuaded by Hayek's arguments.

I can understand why the leftist Huffington Post publishes her articles. I am appalled by the fact that Tea Party voters take her seriously. It reminds me that Read was correct 40 years ago. Things have barely changed.

Printer-Friendly Format

 Tip of the Week
Sign up for my free
Tip of the Week
Verification Characters:    Type     J  G  U  G  V     here   

Tip of the week archives
On what this icon
means, and how it
can help you,
click here
 Q & A Forums
General Q&A Forum
Advertising and Resumés
American History Topics
Backyard Food Gardening
Banking and Politics
Blog Sites and Web Sites
Books Worth Reading
Bumper Sticker Slogans
Business Forum
Buying Smart
Christian Service Forum
College -- The Cheap Way
Education Alternatives
Food Storage
For Women Only
GNC Benefits
GNC Testimonials
Gold and Silver
Great Default Forum
Health and Diet
Health Insurance
Investments Forum
Iran War
Job, Calling, and Career
Leadership Development
Legacy Building
Less Dependent Living
Local Political Action
Non-Retirement Forum
One Good Idea
Police State
Public Speaking
Real Estate Forum
Remnant Review Forum
Safe Places Forum
Taxation Policy
Typographical Errors
Video Production Basics

Reality Check
 Discussion Forum
Search Discussion

Recent Forum Posts
• Safe currencies to hold
• Benjamin Graham?
• A Motif masochist investor asks
• "Asset Based Long Term Care" annuities
• Buying pipelines at the next crash
• RE:Concierge Doctor
• Discover Bank 0.9% APR?
• getting out of the euro
• Amazing Dollar Strength
• Stuck in 401K. Help!
• Currency Wars
• Need Any Adjustments?
• What is the third question?
• What to do with my IRA funds?
• 529 plans
• Rent controls in mass inflation:where to go?
• How to calculate ROI for a rental property?
• How should I sell a house?
• location Vs. amenities
• DFW Real Estate - Bubble Economy
• Rental houses: cash flow
• RentoMeter site
• Renting individual Rooms vs. Whole house
• Are real estate agents driving this phenomenon?
• Intro to Real Estate
• best-and-worst-m arkets-for-rent al-returns
• Establishing a rental farm away from where I live
• 9 out 10 Most Expensive Cities are in California
• Moral standards and renters
• Malls Fill Vacant Stores With Server Rooms
• Time to leave America while you still can ?
• Impact Fees for New Florida Residents
• New Hampshire and Florida
• Ecuador and PR
• Survivor library
• Missle Silo converted to Condos
• Does the South suck?
• Moving TO the US?
• No City for Old People
• Will you die getting to your bug out location?
• teaching English overseas - some questions
• The state with the most Liberty
• Switzerland and Firearms
• On "Zip Code Searching On The Web"
• Crash Course in becoming an Expat
• Kurzweil on Financial Times
• Why is this fantasy world stuff?
• One change could help saving for retirement
• Forced retirement - lump sum - legal work
• Moving Retirement Funds
• Sudden Wealth Advice
• Sudden Wealth Advice
• Question on Traditional Pensions
• advice on how do I interact with my older parents?
• Do You Sincerely Want to Be Rich? Why?
• Req. For No 401(k)/Other Pensions via Relocatio
• Cashing out 401K to pay student debt?
• SS @ 62 and still working
• Desolation or Prosperity?
• I take it Retirement Armageddon is not available
• Business in 3rd world vs Working in 1st World
• Robert Ringer dealmaking course
• Original Watson video
• Residential Real Estate and the Great Default?
• Walmart shutting stores across America?!?
• Mini-Defaults: Municipal Equity Issuance
• My heart attack, update
• Great Default: How Are You Preparing Now?
• Where to find the COR position papers?
• Driverless Cars
• Greece vs the Eurozone
• What will get cut first?
• After many years, cookies must be enabled?
• Yellow Pages Qualifications
• Questions for small business owners
• Leasing Question
• New Motor Technbology
• MBA programs that get you where you want to go
• a different marketing - using academia
• Video Interview Equipment
• Beginner Business Structure
• Apply 80/20
• Good Recruiting wins Championships = $$$
• Meeting with the State
• Family earns $1 Million from YouTube vids
• Customer Service and Ethics Still Rule?
• Business Loans Question
• The life value of a customer ?
• If an Algorithm Wrote This, How Would You know?