Gary North on current economic affairs and investment marketsGary North -- Specific Answers
HomeContact MeTell a FriendText SizeSearchMember Area
Gain immediate access to all of our current articles, the question-and-answer forums, dozens of free books, and article archives. Click here for details on how to join.

About This Site
Academic Gaps
Capitalism and the Bible
Christian Economics
Clichés of Protectionism
College Finances
Debt Management
Ellen Brown: Critique
Federal Reserve Charts
Gary North's Free Books
Get Published Here!
Gold Price & My Report
Keynes Project
One Lesson
Price Index (U.S.A.)
Questions for Jim Wallis
Remnant Review
Social Security/Medicare
Sustained Revival
Tea Party Economist
U.S. Debt Clock
Yield Curve
Your YouTube Channel
Gary North's Miscellany
Budgeting for Wealth
Business Start-Up
Career Advancement
Digital Tools
Education That Works
Evernote: Free Notes
Federal Reserve Policy
Fireproof Your Job
Goal-Setting for Success
Great Default
Inheritance Strategies
International Investing
Investment Basics
Job and Calling
Keynesian Economics
Marketing Case Studies
Precious Metals
Real Estate
Safe Places
State of the Economy
Stocks and Bonds
Study Habits
Video Channel Profits
Members' Free Manuals
Our Products
Contact Me
Tell a Friend
Text Size
Your Account
My 100% Guarantee
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

This site powered by MemberGate

Historical Response #30: Ellen Brown Admits I Was Right -- She Got Her Dates Scrambled. But That's Irrelevant, She Insists.

Gary North
Printer-Friendly Format

Ellen Brown is trapped. I caught her in a gaffe: mis-dating Shays's Rebellion. She admits that I am correct, but denies any significance to this gaffe.

Here is my original critique, which went into far more than her mis-dating of Shays's Rebellion.

Here is her scatter-shot response, which covers several things.

30. Gold's price rose in the 19th century

Here is a 1909 book about gold prices from 1890 to 1907, the economically depressed period I was writing about --

Gold's price rose in terms of wheat, which is what the farmers cared about and what I was referring to. Of course it stayed stable in terms of the "dollar," because the dollar was backed by gold! If you can always trade a dollar in for a dollar's worth of gold, the value of gold is always going to be the same, no? But that's not going to stabilize prices for farmers.

Shays' Rebellion (1786) took place after the Constitution was ratified (1788).

My quote is:

The drawbacks of limiting the medium of exchange to precious metals were obvious as soon as the Founding Fathers decided on a precious metal standard at the Constitutional Convention, when the money supply contracted so sharply that farmers rioted in the streets in Shay's rebellion.

I take your point on the dates, but my overall point is still correct. Shays' Rebellion WAS about a contracting money supply, which occurred when paper money could not be used in the payment of taxes. Wikipedia says of Shays' Rebellion --

Seeking debt relief through the issuance of paper currency and lower taxes, they attempted to prevent the courts from seizing property from indebted farmers by forcing the closure of courts in western Massachusetts.

They wanted to be able to use their paper money to pay taxes, and the "elitists" at the Constitutional Convention insisted on using only precious metals. That's not my word. Leonard Richards writes in "Shays's Rebellion: The American Revolution's Final Battle" (University of Pennsylvania press 2002):

Rufus King and the other sponsors of the Constitution thus faced an uphill battle at the Massachusetts ratifying convention. Not only did they have to confront old enemies, they lacked popular support. They spoke for a document that began with "We the People," but it was not the "people" who had demanded a new national government. Instead, the Constitution was the handiwork of a small segment of governing elite, and everyone knew it. . . . Every critic, it seemed, envisioned the "little people" being stomped on by "the well-born," "the great men," and "the aristocracy." (Pp 147-48)

Paper money was the money of the people. Gold was the money of the elite, and gold prevailed. The "little people" obviously did not have it; so for them the money supply had shrunk radically, and depression ensued.

That's all the time I'd better give to this. There is much real work to do to save the economy and turn it around. That's the battle I want to fight right now. ForeclosureGate beckons!

First, she begins by saying that gold's price rose in terms of wheat. It did, indeed. She does not explain why. There was a reason: because of the invention of the mechanical reaper in 1834 and the coming of the railroads to the gran farming region in the 1850s, wheat's price fell for the entire period of the gold standard, except during the Civil War, when the gold standard was suspended by Lincoln.

If lawyer Brown had simply consulted Cliffs Notes, she would have understood why wheat prices fell.

Farm production and declining prices. Bringing new lands under cultivation and the widespread use of machinery led to a tremendous increase in farm production. The wheat crop, which became an export staple, grew from 170 million bushels at the end of the Civil War to more than 700 million bushels by the close of the century. Overproduction in the United States and expanded crop production in Argentina, Australia, Canada, and Russia drove agricultural prices down during the same period. Unfortunately, American farmers did not seem to understand how the market operated. When prices fell, the inclination was to plant more, which added to the worldwide surplus and pushed prices still lower.

These words are crucial: "Unfortunately, American farmers did not seem to understand how the market operated." Neither does Ellen Brown.

Second, I said that she got the date of Shays's Rebellion wrong. She dated it after the Constitutional Convention (1787). It took place before (1786-87), and was in fact the #1 cause in getting George Washington to attend the Convention. Had he not attended, there would have been no convention.

She now admits that I was correct: "I take your point on the dates."

How could she have made such a mistake? Simple: she knows very little about American history.

Third, she says that the rebellion was about paper money. Yes, it was, as I pointed out in my original article on Shays's rebellion. But it was not about the non-printing of paper money in 1786. It was about the printing of money during the Revolution: the Continentals. The hyperinflation of that government fiat money (1770s Greenbacks) produced a steep discount of the bonds issued by the commonwealth of Massachusetts to pay the soldiers, of whom Shays was one: a captain. Investors bought them cheap.

Prior to 1786, the governor of Massachusetts, John Hancock, had allowed the people to pay taxes in the state's paper money. He decided not to run again in 1786. The new legislature and governor in 1786 changed the law, demanding tax payments in silver. Why? Because he and the Boston legislators had bought up the discounted notes, super cheap, and then changed the law: the interest payments would now be made in silver. My article on this is here:

Note: I relied on the book she used in her attempt to refute me, Richards's 2002 study. She clearly did not read the book. She also did not understand my summary of the book in my article. She missed Richards's main point: the revolt was not about a lack of paper money. It was about a change in the property tax law. This is why his book is so important. It undermines the standard textbook account of the event, which rely on the deflation argument.

Brown did not understand the book's thesis or its importance. She is a lawyer, not an historian. She is not interested in historical facts. She is only interested in persuading people that they can trust Congress to issue fiat money.

Fourth, she writes: "Paper money was the money of the people. Gold was the money of the elite, and gold prevailed." But gold did not prevail. Silver prevailed. The common currency was silver and remained silver except when Gresham's Law took over and silver went into hoards when it was artificially underpriced by the 16-to-1 ratio law (a price control, which created a shortage if silver coins). That came much later, in the nineteenth century.

With this response, she called off the debate.

That leaves 21 additional criticisms left on the table, unanswred.

* * * * * * * * * *

I offered 31 examples of historical errors in The Web of Debt. She responded to 30 of these. In a few cases, she admitted that I was correct. This case is one of them: the dating of Shays's Rebellion. But in all other cases where she tried to defend herself, she was wrong. I have gone through her responses, case by case.

I identified 52 errors in her book. I have added links to my 30 replies in the 30 original articles to which she responded. You can read everything here:

She had yet to respond to my 21 errors in economic theory. Yet these are the heart of her book's failure. The historical errors are merely examples of her sloppy research.

Ellen Brown has not successfully defended her book. She has now quit trying.

That's all the time I'd better give to this. There is much real work to do to save the economy and turn it around. That's the battle I want to fight right no. ForeclosureGate beckons!

She cannot assess the logic of economic theory. She also does not understand the basics of historical research.

Then, in arguing her case against my criticisms, she has revealed an inability to recognize when her logic looks silly. I have concluded that she would be not be a good lawyer to defend me if I were on trial. She cannot even defend herself.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Then there is Bill Still. He has produced two videos: The Money Masters and The Secret of Oz. They are simply defenses of Greenbackism. Bill Still is Ellen Brown without the footnotes. There is no reason for me to spend any time refuting him. If you refute one Greenbacker, you have refuted them all.

If you want a reliable video on the Federal Reserve System, watch the movie produced by the Mises Institute.

Printer-Friendly Format
 Tip of the Week
Sign up for my free
Tip of the Week
Verification Characters:    Type     K  S  R  9  Y     here   

Tip of the week archives
On what this icon
means, and how it
can help you,
click here
 Q & A Forums
General Q&A Forum
Advertising and Resumés
American History Topics
Backyard Food Gardening
Banking and Politics
Blog Sites and Web Sites
Books Worth Reading
Bumper Sticker Slogans
Business Forum
Buying Smart
Christian Service Forum
College -- The Cheap Way
Education Alternatives
Food Storage
For Women Only
GNC Benefits
GNC Testimonials
Gold and Silver
Great Default Forum
Health and Diet
Health Insurance
Investments Forum
Iran War
Job, Calling, and Career
Leadership Development
Legacy Building
Less Dependent Living
Local Political Action
Non-Retirement Forum
One Good Idea
Police State
Public Speaking
Real Estate Forum
Remnant Review Forum
Safe Places Forum
Taxation Policy
Typographical Errors
Video Production Basics

Reality Check
 Discussion Forum
Search Discussion

Recent Forum Posts
• Negative interest rates
• Looking for educational material
• Safe currencies to hold
• Benjamin Graham?
• A Motif masochist investor asks
• "Asset Based Long Term Care" annuities
• Buying pipelines at the next crash
• RE:Concierge Doctor
• Discover Bank 0.9% APR?
• getting out of the euro
• Amazing Dollar Strength
• Stuck in 401K. Help!
• Currency Wars
• Need Any Adjustments?
• What is the third question?
• Developing a mobile home park
• Word press plug in
• Rent controls in mass inflation:where to go?
• How to calculate ROI for a rental property?
• How should I sell a house?
• location Vs. amenities
• DFW Real Estate - Bubble Economy
• Rental houses: cash flow
• RentoMeter site
• Renting individual Rooms vs. Whole house
• Are real estate agents driving this phenomenon?
• Intro to Real Estate
• best-and-worst-m arkets-for-rent al-returns
• Establishing a rental farm away from where I live
• 9 out 10 Most Expensive Cities are in California
• US Pop update: 78% pop decline by 2025 !
• Price Book- End of America
• Time to leave America while you still can ?
• Impact Fees for New Florida Residents
• New Hampshire and Florida
• Ecuador and PR
• Survivor library
• Missle Silo converted to Condos
• Does the South suck?
• Moving TO the US?
• No City for Old People
• Will you die getting to your bug out location?
• teaching English overseas - some questions
• The state with the most Liberty
• Switzerland and Firearms
• Kurzweil on Financial Times
• Why is this fantasy world stuff?
• One change could help saving for retirement
• Forced retirement - lump sum - legal work
• Moving Retirement Funds
• Sudden Wealth Advice
• Sudden Wealth Advice
• Question on Traditional Pensions
• advice on how do I interact with my older parents?
• Do You Sincerely Want to Be Rich? Why?
• Req. For No 401(k)/Other Pensions via Relocatio
• Cashing out 401K to pay student debt?
• SS @ 62 and still working
• Desolation or Prosperity?
• I take it Retirement Armageddon is not available
• How to get rid of comments on YouTube
• Is this the apocalypse? ask locals.
• Negative bank interest in US -Booming stock market
• Psychological Principle.
• My local plumber and yellow page advertising
• Turing Test for Financial Advisor
• Jade Helm 15
• Broken Window Minimum Wage Churchill Discussion
• I'm at a Checkpoint
• What's Holding Homeschooling Back?
• Buying Rental Properties
• Wikipedia: Dr North has missed the point
• marketing question
• The Industry in Which Costs and Revenues....
• How to Overcome Fear
• A Low-Cost Weekend Business to Retire Into
• Questions for small business owners
• Leasing Question
• New Motor Technbology
• MBA programs that get you where you want to go
• a different marketing - using academia
• Video Interview Equipment
• Beginner Business Structure
• Apply 80/20
• Good Recruiting wins Championships = $$$
• Meeting with the State
• Family earns $1 Million from YouTube vids
• Customer Service and Ethics Still Rule?
• Business Loans Question
• The life value of a customer ?