Gary North on current economic affairs and investment marketsGary North -- Specific Answers
HomeContact MeTell a FriendText SizeSearchMember Area
Gain immediate access to all of our current articles, the question-and-answer forums, dozens of free books, and article archives. Click here for details on how to join.

About This Site
Academic Gaps
Articles
Capitalism and the Bible
Clichés of Protectionism
College Finances
Debt Management
Ellen Brown: Critique
Federal Reserve Charts
Gary North's Free Books
Get Published Here!
Gold Price & My Report
Keynes Project
Price Index (U.S.A.)
Questions for Jim Wallis
Remnant Review
Social Security/Medicare
Sustained Revival
Tea Party Economist
U.S. Debt Clock
Yield Curve
Your YouTube Channel
Gary North's Miscellany
Advertising
Blogging
Budgeting for Wealth
Business Start-Up
Career Advancement
Digital Tools
Education That Works
Evernote: Free Notes
Federal Reserve Policy
Fireproof Your Job
Goal-Setting for Success
Great Default
Inheritance Strategies
Insurance
International Investing
Investment Basics
Job and Calling
Keynesian Economics
Leadership
Marketing Case Studies
Obamanomics
Precious Metals
Real Estate
Retirement
Safe Places
State of the Economy
Stocks and Bonds
Study Habits
Video Channel Profits
Members' Free Manuals
Our Products
Contact Me
Help
Tell a Friend
Text Size
Your Account
My 100% Guarantee
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use


This site powered by MemberGate

Idealistic Voting Bloc: Ron Paul's Appeal to the 18-29 Electorate

Gary North
Printer-Friendly Format

Jan. 7, 2012

The youth vote was the big news for Obama in 2008. He was seen as the candidate of the disaffected youth. This assessment was accurate. They did rally to him. But he failed to deliver. He turned out to be the vetted President. The Council on Foreign Relations had sanctioned him, and he delivered the goods, as every President has since 1924, except for Reagan.

Obama's magic has faded. He did not shut down Guantanamo. He did not get out of Iraq until al-Malkiki's government demanded that the U.S. remove our troops. He never promised to get out of Afghanistan. So, the peace faction inside the Democrat Party, always in the minority, has once again had to eat crow.

The age of idealism is 18-29, when personal commitments are low. The cost of being an idealist are low. As economists say, when the price of something is low, more is demanded. This is surely true of idealism.

Nevertheless, some of this youthful idealism sticks for a while, sometimes a long while. The attitudes that are formed in one's idealistic youth somehow survive the years of running head-first into institutional brick walls.

In the Iowa caucuses, he received 48% of the votes of those in the 17 to 29 age group. What is remarkable about this is Paul's age. At 76, he is far removed from the presumed concerns of the youngsters. And yet his words and his voting record have gained him their support.

This is bad news for the existing Republican majority. The conservatives who entered the party in 1980, at the height of the Cold War, are still fighting the mental battles of that era. This is understandable. Their idealism was forged in an era in which the world had lived in the shadow of nuclear war ever since 1962, when the youthful and supposedly idealistic John Kennedy almost started World War III in October.

The USSR committed suicide in December 1991. The Pentagon's budget did not get cut. It was increased. The rhetoric of the clash of empires has remained. Clinton did not change this. He took us into war in Bosnia. Does anyone recall why? Bush II escalated this rhetoric. He was able to get Congress to pass the Patriot Act, which had been Clinton's goal. It was called the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995. Joe Biden's office drafted most of it.

The idealism of one era tends to become established opinion in the next. "Ask what you can do for your country" became the Kennedy's era idealism. Coupled with Lyndon Johnson's Great Society legislation plus Johnson's war in Vietnam, Nixon solidified the system. The same rulers were in charge: the CFR. Jimmy Carter, a Trilateral Commission member from the beginning in 1973, did not change anything.

Reagan changed the rhetoric. This was important. He also sped up the bankruptcy of the USSR. But Bush's team ran the day-to-day White House. James Baker was Bush's point man inside Reagan's Administration. The system got bigger. Reagan also presided over the deficits, beginning in 1983.

President by President, the idealism of youth gets absorbed into the institutionalized system, always expanding the power of the system. Congress runs the way it was explained to Eddie Murphy in The Distinguished Gentleman. Murphy plays a small-time con man who accidentally gets elected to Congress. There, he meets the big-time con men.

Ron Paul is different. He survived Congress and did not sell out to the system. That's why, at age 76, he is so appealing to the idealistic youth in the party. He is living proof that a principled man can survive in the system. The problem is, such a man cannot move the system. The system, like an iceberg, floats along with the current of the era.

The Christian Science Monitor asked: "Does Ron Paul want to be president or a prophet?" It has been clear since his election in 1976 that the answer is: prophet.

This appeals to the young. It does not appeal to the old. The older members of both parties are still enthralled by the Punch and Judy show orchestrated by the CFR. CFR Team A fights valiantly to defeat CFR Team B. The left wing of the CFR is presently occupying the White House. Republicans dream of a victory of the right wing of the CFR.

Ron Paul has a slogan that describes this. In the "Prophet" article, he is quoted as saying this of his rivals: "They come and they go, and they all belong to the status quo." This is accurate. The young supporters know it's accurate. They are not willing to fall into lock-step with the status quo.

If he loses, he will retain a portion of his younger followers. I hope that his mailing list will be kept alive by mailings. In 1976, I persuaded him to set up a Code-A-Phone system in his home district. Constituents could call free of charge to hear a short weekly message. He took my advice. When he lost in November, he went home to Lake Jackson. But he kept that weekly commentary going. In 1978, he defeated the man who beat him by under 300 votes in 1976. I think he will do the same with his sites and email lists. Anyway, I hope so.

If he did two things, he could change the nation. First, he sets up a Ron Paul Academy. It would be like the Khan Academy: free courses aimed at for home schoolers. He could specialize: a high school curriculum. Second, he sets up a training program on how to get elected in local political races.

With the academy, he attains continuity for his ideas. With the political training program, he channels the enthusiasm demonstrated by his supporters into real-world change. If he just did one thing, namely, show his followers how to organize against bond issues, this would change the political landscape within a decade. It would strangle the expansion of local government.

This is doable. This is how the idealism of his followers could be translated into a long-term political movement based on his principles of limited civil government and the decentralization of political power.

The longer he stays in the race, the larger his mailing list will get. The longer his mailing list gets, the more influence he will have at age 85.

There is a precedent for this. William Jennings Bryan with one speech transformed the Democrat Party from a libertarian party to a statist party. That was in 1896. He ran three times as the Democrat candidate: 1896, 1900, and 1908. He lost. He stayed on the speaking circuit.

Meanwhile, his brother Charles built his mailing list. This was the first national political mailing list. It kept his brother's name in front of the voters. So influential was this list that the Democrats nominated Charles as their Vice Presidential candidate in 1924. This was nine years after Bryan had resigned as Wilson's Secretary of State in opposition to Wilson's non-neutrality regarding the war in Europe. By 1924, Bryan had become a crusader against Darwinism in the public schools. Still, the convention nominated Charles to run with New York lawyer John W. Davis, a founder of the CFR in 1921, and the first CFR member to be nominated by a political party as its Presidential candidate. He lost to Coolidge, the last President not to be have his administration run by the CFR.

The youth who are flocking to Ron Paul's campaign need not scatter if he loses. If the organization can make the transition from running for President to reconstructing American politics from the bottom up, his legacy will become a turning point in American history. If this is backed up by a pro-free market online curriculum, this will serve as the foundation of a freer society after Washington's Great Default.


Printer-Friendly Format

 Tip of the Week
Sign up for my free
Tip of the Week
Verification Characters:    Type     7  F  7  8  K     here   


Tip of the week archives
On what this icon
means, and how it
can help you,
click here
 Q & A Forums
General Q&A Forum
Advertising and Resumés
Affiliates
American History Topics
Backyard Food Gardening
Banking and Politics
Blog Sites and Web Sites
Books Worth Reading
Bumper Sticker Slogans
Business Forum
Buying Smart
Christian Service Forum
College -- The Cheap Way
Copywriting
Education Alternatives
Food Storage
For Women Only
Fukushima
GNC Benefits
GNC Testimonials
Gold and Silver
Great Default Forum
Health and Diet
Health Insurance
Homeschooling
Investments Forum
Iran War
Job, Calling, and Career
Leadership Development
Legacy Building
Less Dependent Living
Local Political Action
Non-Retirement Forum
One Good Idea
Police State
Privacy
Public Speaking
Real Estate Forum
Remnant Review Forum
Safe Places Forum
Taxation Policy
Typographical Errors
Video Production Basics

 Archives
Reality Check
 Discussion Forum
Search Discussion


Recent Forum Posts
• INVESTING IN TAX LIENS
• monetary deceleration will bring a bust
• Sell some Mineral Rights?
• Amazon versus Walmart
• why do you say public stock investors are doomed?
• silver purchase
• My grandparents are retired with 220k
• Probate Investing
• Gold Purchase
• Shipping Containers
• Job Candidacy
• an unconventional guide to investing...
• Strong Dollar
• Foreign Currencies
• Watch Junk Bonds For Early Warnings Of Fin. Crisis
• Tenant causing civil forfeiture...
• INVESTING IN TAX LIENS
• Rental Strategy
• Foundation Issues
• Any idea how to market a property to Chinese?
• Buying from a distressed seller
• Menacarow and The Paper Source
• What value should you place on a neighborhood?
• What to Do with Bay Area Home Equity?
• Reverberations from city of Dallas’ HUD discrimina
• “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
• Renting to college students
• On Making an Offer
• SEC Commissioner Warns of Financial Crisis
• Big Data for real estate?
• Survivor library
• Missle Silo converted to Condos
• Does the South suck?
• Moving TO the US?
• No City for Old People
• Will you die getting to your bug out location?
• teaching English overseas - some questions
• The state with the most Liberty
• Switzerland and Firearms
• On "Zip Code Searching On The Web"
• Crash Course in becoming an Expat
• Anyone tried Puerto Rico?
• Chattanooga, Tennessee
• Middle Class squeezed out of Chicago
• An Article on Chile
• Sudden Wealth Advice
• Sudden Wealth Advice
• Question on Traditional Pensions
• advice on how do I interact with my older parents?
• Do You Sincerely Want to Be Rich? Why?
• Req. For No 401(k)/Other Pensions via Relocatio
• Cashing out 401K to pay student debt?
• SS @ 62 and still working
• Desolation or Prosperity?
• I take it Retirement Armageddon is not available
• Post Retirement Career
• Social Security - when to start collecting
• 401K Risk
• Detroit Retirees Fight 83% Health Care Cut
• Lump Sum Early DROP
• Praying for You
• ebook for "learning to read"
• Speed Reading
• 401k. Worth it, or no?
• Chickens as an investment
• Why did Ferguson prosecuting attorney..........?
• Success Story of Divorced Wife
• Walmart, workers and 50% plus 1
• Baxter today, Amelia in two weeks?
• U.N. Arms Trade Treaty
• On line school in CA
• Distractions Disrupting Self-Dicipline
• Finger in the Wind vs. Seize the Day: Amnesty Annu
• Dying Christian women
• Problem: Recovering from an Initial Error in Start
• Should I Advertise Here?
• Initial Price - Rule of Thumb
• Janitorial business start up
• Targeted market research?
• Product or service
• Food Service Start Up
• I've been encouraged to start two side businesses
• book keeping as a home based career?
• book on getting organized
• how to decide on a price for my subscription site?
• HP plans to make 3-D printing everyday thing
• Attn eBay'ers: Turbo Lister 2
• 5 Business lessons from Escort (USP)
• Value of Equity in a small business
• Idea for a reality show--"Do That Job!"