A Weekend Free Zoom Conference on 9/11 Begins This Evening
This evening, there will be a free Zoom conference on 9/11. It is sponsored by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
This conference will continue over the weekend: three hours each day. If you are interested, the information is here:
Anyone who is a careful student of history has to admit that the tools of historical research and understanding are so limited in this age of technology and digital recordings that we might as well make up stories about what happened on 9/11.
After all, most of the information we have is based on a series of stories that make no sense.
SHANKSVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
First, there is the story of the crash of the plane in Shanksville. We are inspired by the phrase, “Let’s roll!” But where is the evidence? This was posted in 2010.
Then there is this.
Next, there was the collapse of Building #7.
BUILDING #7
This building was not hit by a plane. It collapsed over seven hours after the first tower did: 5:20 PM.
From the beginning, we were told this by Dan Rather. The collapse was like a demolition.
My favorite example of the timeline of collapse is this. On British television, an announcement was made of the collapse of the building minutes before the building collapsed. This has been online for years.
There is a team of scientists who have been investigating the collapse of Building #7 for almost two decades. They say that it could not have collapsed because of the small fires in it, contrary to the government's report, which took years to produce.
This press release was released in 2019.
The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, was not a result of fires, according to a draft report released yesterday by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) following a four-year computer modeling study funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.The UAF team's findings contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire. The collapse of WTC 7 has long been the subject of controversy, with critics of the government's account arguing it was brought down in a controlled demolition.
UAF civil engineering professor Leroy Hulsey was the study's principal investigator. Feng Xiao, now an associate professor at Nanjing University of Science and Technology, and Zhili Quan, now a bridge engineer for the South Carolina Department of Transportation, were research assistants and co-authors.
"Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the collapse recorded on video," said Professor Hulsey. "We simulated every plausible scenario, and we found that the series of failures that NIST claimed triggered a progressive collapse of the entire structure could not have occurred. The only thing that could have brought this structure down in the manner observed on 9/11 is the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building below Floor 17."
The UAF study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), a nonprofit representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization's petition calling upon Congress to open a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.
The release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year. The research team plans to make public by the end of September all of the data used and generated during the study, a decision that contrasts with NIST's withholding of key modeling data on the grounds that releasing it "might jeopardize public safety."
For more information, visit http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 and https://AE911Truth.org/wtc7.
SOURCE Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
This organization has had repeated meetings this year. Unfortunately, these meetings began almost exactly at the time of the coronavirus. News of the coronavirus overwhelmed all other news. This weekend's conference is sponsored by this organization.
CONCLUSION
Specialists should continue to research and publish.
The public should continue to disbelieve the official story.
But let us not expect a single replacement narrative to replace the government's version. It is like the JFK assassination, only worse. There were four planes whose crashes have not been explained, plus the collapse of three buildings.