Flight Manifests of the 9/11 Hijackers
Sept. 14, 2009
In the days after the 9/11 flights, I sent out a report on the absence of any names of the alleged hijackers. My report is in many locations on the Web. Here are examples:
http://www.rense.com/general15/perplexingpuzzle.htmhttp://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Ppuzzle.html
http://www.mycountryrightorwrong.net/victimsandhijackerslist.htm
For eight years, I was not contacted on this matter. But today, I received this.
The flight manifests were exhibits in the Moussaoui trial, and they showed all of passengers' and the 19 hijackers' names and their seat numbers.
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/docs/Flight11.png
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/docs/Flight175.png
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/docs/Flight77.png
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/docs/Flight93.pngWere United and American Airlines in on the conspiracy too, along with CNN and other news sources? The media links and URL you furnished were to lists of VICTIMS, and did not include hijackers or some of the passengers at the request of their families. Atta was heard over the radio, and Airfone calls from passengers described the hijackers and what they were doing. DNA has matched some of the hijackers on UA 93 and possibly others, although it's been a while since I read this Newsweek article and don't feel like checking right now:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/177724
Slightly different organization, but same idea, and they finished the job started in 1993, after two suicide bombings of US embassies in Africa and the suicide attack on the Cole. That's ~250 dead people and bin Laden has given us his reason for it:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1998.html
Does someone need to draw you a picture? What's your theory on why four US airliners veered way off course and crashed on 9/11, killing thousands of people? Holograms, voice morphing and remote control so we could get bogged down in Afghanistan and make the stupid decision to invade Iraq? Jeezus... Btw, I'd rather stay anonymous on the Internet. I don't want death threats from truther nuts like the ones received by Val McClatchey, Lloyd England, Mark Roberts, and others.
I asked the person if he wanted his name on this article. He says his name is Albury Smith.
I have long maintained that there is a need for websites dealing with this: what could not possibly have caused the collapse of the buildings. These sites would be based on engineering and physics. They should offer no theory of what did happen. That would dilute the value of the sites by offering endless rabbit trails.
Until we know what could not have happened, it is fruitless to spin theories of what did happen. This is why I have not offered a theory of what did happen.
My main question has always been this: How did Building 7 collapse? What caused this? First, we need a site on what could not have caused it.
There is another need: a site devoted exclusively to the chronology of 9/11, beginning with the loading of the planes. The historian and the reporter ask the five W's: who, what, when, where, and why. The site would ban all discussions of why. It would have links to verifiable sources of the time of each event.
We cannot know why until we know who and when.
I have hired a programmer to develop the software for the creation of such a site. It will allow the public to post, Wiki-like. It will offer discussion forums to debate the issues of chronology.